Jump to content
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble

Badania w Nowej Zelandii wykazały, że jako grupa, jedynie mężczyźni płacą podatki

Recommended Posts

Natrafiłem w sieci na komentarz do interesującego nowozelandzkiego badania naukowego, które miało za zadanie porównać poziom dochodów i wpływów podatkowych ze względu na płeć i wiek tamże.

Wnioski okazały się być "zaskakujące".


Link do pełnej publikacji:




Research finds that as a group, only men pay tax  


Legions of feminists will ferociously type smash the patriarchy! at their Internet rallies, calling out for the end of the male supremacy in all spheres of life. Yet, few of them acknowledge the fact that one of these spheres, the government (the institution granting them rights), is entirely funded by male taxpayers. Economically, women cost more to the state than they benefit. The government is literally paying women to be alive. As such, strong independent women are only that way because the state is transferring money from men to them. Feminists are not seriously against being dependent on men, they are just against men having the full control over their money.


Let’s explore a fiscal research report in New Zealand.

The real gender gap: the tax gap

While the 77¢ for a dollar wage gap has been under the spotlight for the past years, the 200¢ for a dollar tax gap has, to my knowledge never been mentioned, at least not by our supreme feminist leaders Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau. A quick glimpse at the data reveals a massive difference in taxes paid by men and women.




The first thing that comes to mind is that half of women might be at home raising kids. However, the workforce participation rate gap between men and women doesn’t seem to exceed 10% in either age group. (see figure 4 in source)


The second thing that may come to mind as a confounding factor is that women spend more for children in education and health. Nope. No support for that either. Men and women spend approximately the same amount in both education and health (see figure 10 and 11 of the source).

In nearly all age groups, women receive more tax than they give

With the exception of the age group between 45-59 (a 15 year span) years old, women cost more to the state than the tax they provide. In contrast, men generate more tax revenue than they cost between 23 and 65 (a 43 year span). In the brief period in which women generate more or as much tax money than they consume, men outscore them by at least 3 times.



By the end of her life, the average woman will have a negative fiscal impact of $150,000

By large, the cumulative tax money given to women outweighs the tax money generated by women. The short period of positive impact of women between 45 and 59 is countered by 65 other years in which their allocated tax expenditure is more than what they supply the state.



Men, on the other hand, appear to have a positive cumulative net fiscal impact from approximately 40 until 80 years of age. For these particular taxes and public expenditures, the net fiscal incidence on men is approximately zero when cumulated over all ages. (p. 22)

Overall, the research suggests that male taxpayers are the only ones to ever have a positive contribution in taxes. Based on Figure 17, the closest that the average woman will come to having a positive fiscal incidence is when she is at minus $50,000 around 55 years of age. While feminists are demonizing men for benefiting from all liberties and rights they have constructed, they have oddly remained silent over the fact that anonymous male tax payers are paying women to exist. Read that sentence again.


The fact that feminists want a stronger government is not a coincidence. While historically, women had to choose a wealthy husband for resources, they can now stay single, be lesbians, marry a poor man, or use the sperm bank, and the state will still transfer male taxes to them. Interestingly, within 10 years of women’s suffrage, the government doubled their tax revenue and expenditure in the USA.


These findings show just how simplistic the notion of privilege is. While men make more on average, it allows women to have access to education, health, and services. The patriarchy is pretty generous after all.





U nas sytuacja nie powinna być jakoś diametralnie inna, zwłaszcza w świetle ostatnich danych GUS i 18,5% różnicy w średniej pensji.

Chcąc czy nie, wszyscy na te biedne i uciśnione przez opresyjny patriarchat kobiety płacimy.

Jak to zostało ładnie ujęte w artykule, jedynie za to, że istnieją.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 6

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feminizm musi poważnie zakasać rękawy i w końcu na serio zabrać się za równouprawnienie ;)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 godzin temu, Ancalagon napisał:

U nas sytuacja nie powinna być jakoś diametralnie inna, zwłaszcza w świetle ostatnich danych GUS i 18,5% różnicy w średniej pensji.

Tym bardziej, że "madki" dostają jeszcze alimenty na siebie, alimenty na dziecko, połowę majątku misia, 500+, zasiłki.

Dopłacamy po kobiecych emerytur, mają studia i kursy za "darmo", czyli za pieniądze mężczyzn, itd.


Kobiety więcej biorą, niż wpłacają. System emerytalny dyskryminuje, ale mężczyzn

Podsumowując - panowie opłacają składki przez 37 lat, a pobierają emerytury przez 11, a kobiety wpłacają do systemu pieniądze przez 33 lata, a pobierają przez 21 lat.

Jeśli przeliczyć to na konkretne kwoty wypłat, to panowie dostają łącznie średnio 345 tys. zł emerytur w ciągu swojego życia, a panie 450 tys. zł. 





  • Thanks 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tak w ogóle tytuł powinien brzmieć "Badania wykazały, że jako grupa, jedynie mężczyźni płacą podatki". Bo jak widać z podanego przez @Morfeusza przykładu w Polsce jest tak samo i w każdym innym kraju "zachodnim" będzie tak samo.


  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dziękuję za te statystyki. Zbierajmy je i szachujmy naszych oponentów w dyskusji. A ciemniaków zawsze jest więcej ;)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.